Criteria |
Guiding questions for judges |
Neutral awards weighting |
Specific awards weighting |
News value: Relevance, context, breaking news |
- Was the journalist the first to break the news?
- Did the journalist present a new, fresh and insightful angle on a story?
- Was the story relevant within the broader societal agenda?
- Was it well contextualised within this relevance?
|
/20 |
/20 |
Impact: Significance, benefit to society |
- Was it of sufficient significance to have an impact on the public?
- Did the story lead to action in the broader sense? E.g. from an industry body, group of consumers, government
- Did it make a positive contribution to society?
|
/10 |
/15 |
Rigour in reporting: Depth and breadth, accuracy, reliability, thoroughness |
- What was the depth of the research conducted by the journalist?
- Did he/she display imagination or resourcefulness in conducting the research?
- Did he/she consult a wide and balanced range of credible sources?
- Are the facts in the story accurate? Is this accuracy evident?
|
/20 |
N/A |
Analytical value: Insight, analysis, interpretation |
- Did the journalist probe the ‘why’ and ‘how’ behind the story?
- Did the journalist conduct sound and insightful analysis of the subject matter?
- Did the story indicate that the journalist had an extremely deep knowledge and understanding of the issue or subject matter?
- Did he/she present this interpretation in a clear, concise and credible manner?
|
/10 |
N/A |
Originality: Enterprise, discovery, originality of subject, originality of initiative, surprising angle |
- How original or unique was the subject matter?
- Did the journalist find an angle which was unexpected?
- Did the journalist display enterprise and initiative in finding the topic?
- Did the journalist execute the story in a unique way?
|
/10 |
/20 |
Integrity: Balance, fairness, independence, transparency |
- Did the journalist present a balanced story by consulting all appropriate sources on all sides?
- Did he/she give all sources equal weighting in the final report?
- Was he/she transparent about his sources and methods?
- Are his/her views independent of any third party agenda?
- Did the journalist distinguish between fact and comment?
|
/10 |
/15 |
Specialist knowledge: depth of understanding of subject matter |
- Did the journalist display deep understanding of the subject matter?
- Did the report/s make a positive contribution to the category (business, economy, financial markets, consumer financial education, the Africa growth story)?
|
/20 |
N/A |
Storytelling - written: |
- Did the journalist succeed in presenting the topic in an understandable, accessible way?
- Did the writer display quality language use? Judge in terms of style, tone, grammar, sentence construction.
- Did the journalist display a deep understanding of how to use the written word to communicate effectively with readers?
- Was there a strong, compelling introduction to the story?
- Was there a well-developed focus and theme?
- Was the story well-organised and structured?
- Was the writing lively and engaging?
|
N/A |
/30 |
Storytelling - visual: |
- Did the journalist succeed in presenting the topic in an understandable, accessible way?
- Did the reporter make exceptional use of the medium through, e.g. innovative techniques?
- Did the journalist display a deep understanding of how to communicate effectively with viewers?
- Was there a strong, compelling introduction to the story?
- Was the narrative clear, concise and grammatically accurate?
- Was the story well organised and structured?
- Was the broadcast lively and engaging?
|
N/A |
/30 |
Storytelling - audio: |
- Did the journalist succeed in presenting the topic in an understandable, accessible way?
- Did the reporter make exceptional use of the medium through, e.g. innovative techniques?
- Did the journalist display a deep understanding of how to use their voice to communicate effectively with listeners?
- Did the report have a strong audio impact?
- Was there a strong, compelling introduction to the story?
- Was the narrative clear, concise and grammatically accurate?
- Was the story well-organised and structured?
- Was the broadcast lively and engaging?
|
N/A |
/30 |
Storytelling -multi-media: |
- Did the report have a strong combined impact across digital, written, visual, audio channels?
- Did the journalist succeed in presenting the topic in an understandable, accessible way?
- Did the journalist display a deep understanding of how to connect with audiences in all mediums used?
- Did the reporter make exceptional use of the mediums through, e.g. innovative techniques?
- Was there a strong, compelling introduction to the story?
- Was the narrative clear, concise and grammatically accurate?
- Was the story well organised and structured?
- Was the multi-platform story-telling lively and engaging?
|
N/A |
30/100 |